Fractional CTO

For companies that need senior technology leadership without a full-time hire.

You have a growing product, a team that needs direction, and decisions that need someone who has made them before. A fractional CTO gives you 2-3 days a week of the same leadership a full-time CTO would provide, at a fraction of the cost. I stay hands-on in the codebase, review architecture decisions in context, and bring 20 years of building production systems across the full stack to the table.

What this looks like

  • Technology strategy and roadmap aligned with business goals
  • Engineering team structure, hiring, and growth plans
  • Architecture decisions, build vs buy, vendor evaluation
  • Board and investor-facing technical narrative
  • DORA metrics, delivery predictability, quality standards

Best fit

  • Series A-C startups and scale-ups
  • Companies with 5-40 engineers
  • Preparing for or recovering from a fundraise
  • Founders who need a technical equal at the table
Typical: 2-3 days/week, 3-12 months
Location: Remote EU-wide, on-site as needed

Interim Head of Engineering

For organisations that need hands-on engineering leadership now, not in three months.

Leadership transitions, post-merger integrations, rapid scaling. Sometimes an organisation needs someone who can step in, stabilise the team, set technical direction, and keep shipping while you find the right permanent hire. I have done this at FinCompare, where I took over the full technology function as interim CTO, reporting to the CEO, and delivered measurable results within months.

What this looks like

  • Full engineering leadership, reporting to CEO/CTO
  • Team stabilisation, morale, and delivery recovery
  • Organisational design (Team Topologies, DDD)
  • Platform modernisation and architecture decisions
  • Hiring process and permanent leadership search support

Best fit

  • Companies in transition or post-merger
  • Leadership gaps that need bridging
  • Organisations that need stabilisation before scaling
  • Teams going through significant technical change
Typical: 3-5 days/week, 3-6 months
Location: Remote EU-wide, regular on-site

Engineering Organisation Assessment

For leaders who want an honest outside perspective before making structural decisions.

A focused 2-4 week engagement where I assess your engineering organisation, architecture, delivery practices, and team structure. You get a written report with specific, actionable recommendations, not a slide deck full of frameworks.

What the assessment covers

  • Team structure and domain ownership
  • Architecture fitness for current and projected scale
  • Delivery practices, CI/CD maturity, quality standards
  • Developer experience and friction points
  • Hiring and talent retention risks
  • AI readiness and adoption opportunities

Best fit

  • CEOs or CTOs who sense something is off
  • Companies preparing for a growth phase
  • Boards that want independent technical due diligence
  • Pre-acquisition technology assessments
Typical: 2-4 weeks
Deliverable: Written report with recommendations

AI-Assisted Development Strategy

For engineering leaders who want a grounded perspective on where AI creates genuine leverage, and where it does not.

I am not selling AI hype. I write code with AI tools every day, building full-stack applications, designing system architecture, and making build-vs-integrate decisions across the stack. The difference: I know where AI accelerates delivery and where it breaks down, because I hit those limits in real codebases, not in demos.

What I can help with

  • Assessing where AI-assisted development fits in your workflow
  • Designing an adoption strategy that does not disrupt delivery
  • Evaluating AI tooling for your stack and team maturity
  • Understanding how AI changes the role of senior engineers and code review

Best fit

  • Engineering leaders exploring AI adoption
  • Teams that want guidance from someone who has done it
  • Can be standalone or integrated into a fractional CTO engagement
Typical: Advisory, 1-2 day workshops, or ongoing
Location: Remote or on-site

How Engagements Work

Every engagement starts with a conversation. No pitch, no sales process. We talk about where you are, what you are trying to achieve, and whether I am the right person to help. If I am not, I will tell you.

If we decide to work together, the structure is simple: a defined scope and expected outcomes, regular check-ins, async-first communication, monthly invoicing, no long-term lock-in. I work remotely from Berlin, available EU-wide with occasional on-site as needed.